
Hotels, hostels, and colivings serve different needs for digital nomads. Hotels offer privacy and consistency but isolate you. You check in, you check out, you speak to nobody. Hostels are cheap and social but built for 21-year-olds passing through in 48 hours: dorm snoring, party culture, nowhere quiet to take a call. Colivings sit in a different category: month-long stays in furnished apartments with built-in community, shared kitchens, coworking space, and people who are actually trying to get work done during the day and have a life in the evening. Cost-wise, a decent hotel runs $60โ150/night in most nomad hubs. Hostels start at $15โ30/night for a dorm bed. Colivings typically run $800โ2,500/month all-in, which works out cheaper than a hotel, more comfortable than a hostel, and infinitely more social than either. For stays longer than two weeks, coliving usually wins on every metric.
Let's be honest with each other for a second.
You've probably Googled some version of "where to stay as a digital nomad" and ended up reading the same recycled content: hotel vs Airbnb vs hostel, with a vague mention of colivings at the end like an afterthought. None of it actually helps you make a decision. It's all hedge-everything, offend-nobody, designed-by-committee content.
So here's our version. We've helped 180+ remote workers move through four countries across Europe and Latin America. We've heard every horror story: the Berlin hotel room with a bed, a desk, and the crushing silence of someone who has not spoken to another human in nine days. The Lisbon hostel dorm where a guy played guitar at 2am. The Airbnb that looked beautiful in photos and smelled like mildew in real life.
We know what the options actually feel like. Let's break it down.
Quick definitions so we're on the same page:
Hotels: Private rooms with daily cleaning, reception staff, and absolutely zero reason to talk to another guest. Designed for people who want to be left alone or are on a three-night business trip. Not optimized for living.
Hostels: Dorm beds (sometimes private rooms) in a social environment, usually cheap, usually aimed at backpackers. Great for short trips. Difficult to work from if you have actual deadlines.
Colivings: Furnished private rooms (or shared) with communal spaces: kitchen, coworking area, living room. Designed for stays of one month or more. Community is the product. Work infrastructure is built in. The whole point is that you get the privacy of a hotel room and the social life of... actually having a social life.
These are not three versions of the same thing. They're solving different problems for different people at different stages of their nomad life.
This is the question that trips everyone up because people compare the wrong numbers.
Here's what a month costs in a typical digital nomad city (let's say Oaxaca, Mexico, or somewhere in Southern Europe):
Hotel:
Hostel:
Coliving:
When you do the full math (accommodation + food infrastructure + work infrastructure + transport to/from coworking spaces), colivings are almost always cheaper than mid-range hotels and close to private hostel rooms, with dramatically better conditions.
A 2024 study by Coliving Insights found the average coliving costs about $1,150/month globally, compared to $1,800+ for a hotel with equivalent amenities. The gap is even bigger when you factor in kitchen access and coworking.
Hotels are great for what they're designed to do: short stays, business travel, tourism. You check in, you sleep, you check out. Nobody bothers you.
That's also the problem.
Remote work loneliness is a real, measurable issue. A 2023 survey by Buffer found that 25% of fully remote workers cite loneliness as their biggest struggle, second only to unplugging after work. Hotels take that problem and put it in a room with a minibar and a firm mattress.
After about five days in a hotel, most digital nomads we've spoken to describe the same arc:
1. Day 1โ2: Lovely, quiet, productive
2. Day 3โ4: Starting to eat a lot of room service
3. Day 5โ7: Have not had a real conversation. Watching TV in languages you don't speak. Wondering why you went remote in the first place.
Hotels also quietly destroy your budget. No kitchen means every meal is restaurant or delivery. In a city like Mexico City, that's fine and affordable. In most of Europe, eating out three times a day adds $40โ70 to your daily spend without you noticing.
And the desk. The hotel desk. Usually positioned so you're staring directly at a beige wall, on a chair that starts hurting your back around hour three. Not a workspace. A place to open a laptop and survive.
What is a slowmad and why are they abandoning hotels entirely?
We love hostels. We do. They democratized travel. They created a whole culture of spontaneous connection between strangers. They gave a generation of broke twentysomethings the ability to see the world.
And then most people turn 25 and stop being able to sleep through someone else's alarm clock going off at 6am in a dorm of eight.
Here's the honest breakdown:
What hostels do well:
What hostels struggle with for remote workers:
A 2022 study by Remote Year found that remote workers who stayed in hostels for longer than two weeks reported higher rates of work disruption compared to those in colivings or dedicated apartments. Shocking to precisely nobody who has tried to submit a deadline from a hostel common room.
What is a coliving? The full definition, not the marketing version
Let us paint a picture.
You arrive in Oaxaca (let's say). You've got a private room. Small, tidy, yours. Your suitcase lives somewhere. Nobody is going to sleep in your bed while you're out.
Downstairs is a proper kitchen: pots, knives, a fridge with your stuff in it, a table where people eat together. Tonight three people are making tacos and someone is trying to explain what mezcal joven vs reposado means and everyone is pretending to understand.
There's a coworking space. Real desks, real chairs, fast internet (tested, not claimed). You can take calls. You can do deep work. You can also slide two meters to your left and ask the person next to you (a UX designer from Warsaw, as it turns out) if your landing page copy makes any sense.
The Wi-Fi password is written on the wall. The host's phone number is in the group chat. If the water goes out at 3pm on a Wednesday, someone is already fixing it.
At 7pm some people go for mezcal. Some people keep working. Nobody is making you do either. But the option to not eat alone in your room while staring at a hotel wall? That option exists.
This is Tuesday at a coliving.
What you typically get:
Why the coliving kitchen is where the magic actually happens
Let's be fair. Hotels aren't the villain.
Hotels make sense when:
For stays under a week, the coliving community advantage hasn't had time to kick in anyway. Use a hotel, enjoy the room service, don't feel bad about it.
Hotels also make sense if you are the type of person who genuinely recharges through solitude. Some people are. If the thought of shared meals makes you want to close a laptop lid, honor that.
Same exercise, same fairness.
Hostels make sense when:
Hostels are harder to justify for remote workers on stays longer than two weeks. The math gets closer to coliving pricing but without the work infrastructure or community continuity.
If you're considering a hostel private room for a month, run the numbers. You might be within โฌ200โโฌ300/month of a coliving that includes a real workspace and 20 people to eat dinner with.
This whole comparison comes down to one thing: how long are you staying?
Coliving economics and social benefits compound over time. The first week you're still figuring out where things are. By week two, you know everyone's name and there are three group chats. By week three, someone's taught you to make mole from scratch and you've had a conversation that shifted how you think about your work. That doesn't happen in a hotel.
Buffer's State of Remote Work data consistently shows that the remote workers with the highest life satisfaction share a few traits: stable community, a dedicated workspace, and regular meals with other people. Colivings are literally designed around all three.
What separates an intentional community from just people sharing a building
For a digital nomad staying somewhere for a month or more, here's the honest ranking:
1. Coliving wins on community, workspace, cost efficiency, and overall quality of life. The product is the people.
2. Long-term Airbnb/apartment wins on privacy and flexibility. Loses on community. You're responsible for your own social life, which most people are bad at when they're in a new country and don't know anyone.
3. Hotel wins for short stays. Loses for everything else. Expensive, isolating, not designed for living.
4. Hostel wins for budget and age 18โ24. Difficult for productive remote work on longer stays.
The coliving vs hostel debate specifically? Hostel wins on price for short trips. Coliving wins on everything else the moment you're staying more than two weeks and you have actual work to do.
Is a coliving cheaper than a hostel?
For short stays (under a week), hostels are cheaper. A dorm bed at $20/night beats most colivings on raw price. For stays of 3โ4 weeks, a hostel private room costs roughly the same as a coliving, often more. When you factor in what colivings include (coworking space, kitchen, community), they typically deliver more value per euro/dollar for stays of a month or longer.
Can you actually work from a coliving?
Yes, and this is a major advantage over hostels and many hotels. Good colivings have dedicated desk space, high-speed internet, and a culture where people respect work hours. At Casa Basilico, we're obsessive about the working infrastructure because it's non-negotiable. You can't enjoy the mezcal at 7pm if your work isn't done by 6pm.
Are colivings just expensive hostels?
No. They're different products entirely. A hostel is transient by design: people come and go, the social scene resets every few days. A coliving builds community over weeks and months. You're not meeting people who are leaving Tuesday. You're meeting people who might become actual friends, collaborators, or travel partners for the next chapter of your life. We've had Casa Basilico guests who've been friends for years.
What's the difference between a coliving and a shared apartment?
A shared apartment is you and some strangers splitting rent. A coliving is a designed community experience with infrastructure, usually events, usually some vetting of who comes in. Someone manages who joins and shapes what the community feels like. In a shared apartment, you might be lucky and get amazing flatmates. In a coliving, that's kind of the whole job.
Are colivings good for introverts?
Yes. The best colivings (not naming names, but hi ๐) don't force participation. You have your private room, you can work in peace, you can skip dinner if you need a quiet night. Social connection is available when you want it. You don't have to manufacture it from scratch every time. For introverts who want community without social pressure, that's actually a better setup than a hotel (isolated) or a hostel (social chaos).
If you've made it this far and you're thinking "okay, a coliving sounds like what I actually want," that's probably worth paying attention to.
We run pop-up foodie colivings for digital nomads who care about good food, real connections, and not eating sad hotel breakfast alone. We've done Spain, Portugal, Brazil, and we've got more chapters coming. The food is genuinely excellent (Fabio cooks, no notes). The community is warm and a little chaotic in the best way.
Come see what we're building. If there's a spot with your name on it, grab it before someone else does. We're small by design.
Ciao,
Fabio & Juls โค๏ธ
